say about microsoft what you want. but in all those years they have never harrassed us about ‚illegal copies of windows or word‘ or whatever ;p why not… because unlike disney and universal. they fix their own business model and implement ‚license keys‘ and things like that whithout which their product simply, in most cases, does not work. ;p instead of terrorizing the entire internet industry over it like disney and universal and such do… i don’t quite see how ‚disney‘ would have met the requirement to apply for copyright protection in that they did ‚everything to prevent unauthorized distribution of their classified material‘ when they put that shit all over record stores on DVDs for anyone to buy.
in fact they did everything they could to make it public domain instead
as it is just that.
either way those people have no right to harrass carriers over such things. our manhours are worth more than their lawyers manhours anyway.
and our internet companies are worth more than disney.
which only sells bullshit. simply don’t even give them a reply. that’s like 15-30 perfectly otherwise profitable manhours gone to waste on someone that isn’t even your paying customer 
carrier immunity does not only include the right not go to go prison or pay fines or whatever over 'things customers (other people
do, or in most cases, do not do (such as removing things :P. it also includes the right not to have your mailbox terrorized with dmca crap and having to answer these randy random fools. that stuff. takes employees. and as such costs money. money that is YOURS.
it also includes the right not to answer (as in, completely ignore them
randy random idiots like ‚spamhaus‘ uttering terrorist ‚demands‘
why answer the guy. seriously. you start doing that for one and they all start to expect you to give everyone their way. just don’t do it EVER. 
or ‚muh our creditcard details or bank accounts got phished‘ yeah so ? we’re not the one issueing our clients with a ‚super secret‘ number to pay with which they then show to every restaurant employee out there.
see if you put it on some plastic card and use it multiple times, it is no longer secret anyway, now please go fix your own business model as we will NOT remove said sites.
oh and btw you owe me like half a million for the consultancy on your businessmodel being insecure.
yeah i see why they arrived in the industry late and left early
LOL. i totally get it. yet… it would be better to just play it out till the end. for the industry as a whole.
if you are naive enough to still run a mailserver, they all see that as an open invitation to send you frivolous legal threats all day in terms of ‚we will sue you‘. no you won’t as you’d lose. plus i can get you disbarred as a lawyer in the usa for even uttering that ‚dmca‘ nonsense under penalty of prejury
as we never applied for the DMCA. we have something better.
LOL.
when it boils down to it those copyright guys still have to prove that:
- it’s the original product without any modifications as that would make it a derivative work (lossy compression causes differences in data, light and audio frequencies even when only considering the playback result, it is not the ‚same work‘.
- that you never obtained a license anyway. through various inheritances i probably own a license 20 times over on every abba and micheal jackson album ever
which i’m free to lend out or sell to others.
(point is: they cannot prove you ever obtained a license. they just claim you would not have one
that, once again, is a failure in their own business model
etc.
we however can very well provide hard evidence that these people are acting like a bunch of money extorting terrorist towards the entire internet industry 
oh that. and some pictures of mickey mouse hardly qualify as ‚a work of art‘ anyway. the internet ITSELF is the only actual work of art mankind created over the past 200 years that is worth that name.
(sorry stoned hippies singing a song or playing a guitar… but eh. ‚art‘ ? that ? lol
ok the telephone and road networks may also qualify
as well as ocean liners and airplanes.
but ‚alice in wonderland?‘ seriously disney? lol. is ‚alice in wonderland‘ gonna get us to different planets all of a suddden or what?
how is that a work of art worth ‚protection‘ lol. in fact disney should be paying us and the piratebay for putting their culture poluting bullcrap movies out there for them
copyright originally was intended to cover the investment in a book printing press after all. that would be, in todays terms: the internet industry
not to give the ‚writer‘ (or his corporate boss
free money for life for only working once 
just terrorizing -their- industry back a bit ofcourse is within the realm of possibilities too. have your legal team speand their free time on confiscating disney cruise lines and disneyland and universal studios california
until they learn.
‚because you can‘ ‚and they made it so that you payrolled 20 lawyers already anyway‘
LOL.